Crane deaths raise alarm about water rights
23 whoopers died over the winter and biologists blame low river flow.
By MATTHEW TRESAUGUE
Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle
April 19, 2009, 11:08PM
A record number of whooping cranes have died while wintering along the
Texas coast this year, leaving biologists stunned and once again placing the
Guadalupe River at the center of the state’s ongoing battle over water
rights.
A dry spell has reduced the Guadalupe’s flow so severely that the
supply of fresh water and food for the endangered whooping cranes dwindled in
San Antonio Bay. As a result, 23 whoopers have perished, the deadliest year
on record for the majestic bird, federal and state wildlife officials said.
The die-off has infused a jolt of heightened urgency into the debate
over the amount and timing of flows in the Guadalupe and how to to protect
the river’s ecosystem and the Gulf Coast estuaries that depend on fresh
water. Historically in Texas, water not tapped by cities, ranchers and industry
and left to run to the Gulf of Mexico has been considered wasted.
“It’s not people’s fault that we’re in a drought,” said Tom Stehn, a
U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologist studying the cranes at the Aransas
National Wildlife Refuge, their wintering grounds near Rockport. “But I wonder how
much worse we’re making it.”
The Guadalupe, a 300-mile-long river that stretches from the Hill
Country to San Antonio Bay, has been a battleground before. At one point, a
conservation group labeled it as one of the country’s most endangered rivers,
just as water suppliers considered pumping water near its mouth to quench
San Antonio’s growing thirst.
Although that plan is on the shelf, studies are under way to determine
what is needed to sustain the whoopers. The first study, commissioned by
two river authorities at the20cost of $2 million, is set for released this
month.
Douglas Slack, a Texas A&M University biologist who conducted the
five-year study, wouldn’t comment on the findings before their release, but said
the research didn’t cover the latest and deadliest season so far for the
cranes. He suggested that his work wouldn’t be the final say on the matter.
“We’ll continue to see ups and downs in precipitation, and it’s pretty
clear that San Antonio and Austin won’t stop growing,” Slack said. “
Questions of inflows will continue throughout my lifetime and yours.”
For Stehn, who has observed the iconic birds for years, the drought has
made it clear that the whoopers’ survival depends upon the availability of
blue crabs, which account for nearly 90 percent of the cranes’ diet and
need a certain amount of fresh water to survive.
The world’s last migratory flock of whooping cranes spends the winter
at the Aransas refuge before leaving every April for a 2,400-mile journey to
Canada’s Wood Buffalo National Park, t he birds’ summer home.
The season began with much promise, with a record 270 whoopers arriving
along the Texas coast last fall.
But reduced fresh water meant fewer blue crabs. By January, with
virtually no blue crabs on the marshy delta, the cranes began to eat clams and
smaller fiddler crabs, but those don’t provide as much protein, Stehn said.
To supplement the cranes’ diet, refuge managers provided corn, marking
the first time since the 1950s that they fed the whoopers.
“Usually, when you see a whooping crane, it’s magnificent,” Stehn said of
North America’s tallest bird. Adults, whose bodies are snowy white except
for black wingtips and a red forehead, stand 5 feet tall with a wingspan of
7 1/2 feet. “This year, they were looking ratty. The importance of blue
crabs to the whooping crane population is just smacking us right in the face.”
While the whooping cranes wintered on the coast, the drought became
severe. The inflows for San Antonio Bay from December to March we re the
lowest since 1956, the height of the worst drought on record for Texas, said
Norman Johns, an Austin-based scientist for the National Wildlife Federation.
The result: a saltier bay, fewer blue crabs and several emaciated
whooping crane carcasses.
The challenge ahead is to manage the state’s rivers in a way that
enough freshwater flows into coastal estuaries to provide nutrients, sediments
and the proper mix of salt and fresh water for sustaining scores of species,
including the cranes, scientists said.
At the same time, there are new urban demands for water, and increasing
pressures on the Guadalupe.
State lawmakers recognized the conflict two years ago, passing a bill
that requires the study of what are called environmental flows for every
river system in Texas. Although the new law began the process of preserving
water for the health and productivity of the ecosystems, the outcome isn’t
guaranteed.
A 1998 state study found that the Guadalupe estuary needs 1.1520 million
acre-feet, or 363 billion gallons, of fresh water a year from the river.
Some interests have criticized the number as too high.
“It’s not high most of the time, but during a drought we shouldn’t expect
it to be available,” Johns said. “It’s too high during a drought, and that’s when push comes to shove.